Our June 6 Western HAN meeting was an opportunity to step back and reflect on the next steps toward universal coverage in Massachusetts. Four reports were recently released regarding Health Care Reform: The Division of Health Care Finance and Policy (DHCFP) reported on employers who have more than 50 employees/dependents on publicly funded health care; the Department of Revenue released data about the first year of the individual mandate (PDF); the Division of Health Care Finance and Policy issued its quarterly indicators report; and the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Foundation and Urban Institute released the results of their survey on health care reform at one year.
We had the opportunity to participate in an excellent dialogue with State Representative Stephen Kulik, Vice Chair of the Joint Committee on Health Care Financing (details follow below). And Michael DeChiara, facilitating his last HAN meeting as Community Partners' Executive Director, acquiesced to our demand that he sit still for a moment while we demonstrated our appreciation for his leadership, commitment, and hard work.
Falling down the gaps
At hospitals and health centers, both self-pay charges and enrollments have decreased from last year. However, gaps in Commonwealth Care coverage remain a serious problem. We heard about one cancer patient who suspended chemotherapy during the month gap between the termination of employer-sponsored insurance and the start of Commonwealth Care. This is a common problem for cancer patients and those who depend on certain prescriptions. Making Commonwealth Care coverage retroactive to cover these gaps would provide continuity of needed care.
Outreach and enrollment workers are also seeing problems with college and university students who waive QSHIP coverage through their school, but then either lose their alternative coverage or realize too late that (because they are full-time students) they are ineligible for Commonwealth Care. Students who lose coverage after signing the Q-SHIP waiver must wait until the next September for another opportunity to enroll – a big problem for those with ongoing health concerns such as diabetes. Educating high school students about the waiver, and working with schools to make the waiver forms more clear, may help some students; others have medical needs that Q-SHIP does not meet (PDF).
HAN participants have been receiving lots of phone calls about premium increases in BMC HealthNet plans that take effect on July 1. The problem is that BMC HealthNet is the most widely accepted insurance in Western Massachusetts hospitals; those who anticipate receiving hospital care are having to continue with BMC HealthNet and pay the premium increase, which exceed the standards set by the affordability schedule. Advocates are asking the Connector to institute a waiver process that would allow people to pay the lower premium if they must stay with a plan out of medical necessity. There is also concern about whether the newly lowest-cost plans have adequate provider networks.
Medicare is changing its regulations around rates for durable medical equipment and MassHealth is following suit. These changes, opposed by advocates (PDF), will exacerbate existing access issues. As small providers of wheelchairs and other essential medical equipment are bought up by national chains it is getting harder for people to get what they need.
Meanwhile, the volume of MassHealth mailings that enrollment workers receive is making it difficult to distinguish valid and urgent mailings to MassHealth and Commonwealth Care clients from sometimes contradictory or duplicate notices.
An exchange of fresh ideas: dialogue with Rep. Kulik
The biggest challenge for Health Care Reform going forward will be financial; the next step for the legislature after Chapter 58 is to look at cost control directly. The Committee on Health Care Financing is planning to bring the quality and costs bill introduced by Senate President Therese Murray to the House floor soon. The bill includes a ban on gifts to providers from pharmaceutical companies.
Rep. Kulik expressed optimism that outreach and enrollment grants will be funded within the FY09 budget currently in Conference Committee. (The House budget included this line item, but it did not make it into the Senate budget.)
Many suggestions emerged from the dialogue between HAN members and Rep. Kulik:
Licensure for Foreign-trained Physicians and Dentists
I'm sure the commenter during the meeting is aware that there are already mechanisms for foreign trained dentists and physicians to practice here in MA. Here at our health center, we have had (and currently have) some excellent foreign trained dentists working. However, he/she is right in that they must practice under a restricted license (they must be supervised by a "fully licensed" dentist) and there should be some mechanism for such dentists to be able to demonstrate competency to practice independently and gain unresticted license status via rigorous testing and perhaps 1 year AEGD dental residency. Otherwise to get an "unrestricted license" in MA, they have to shell out a lot of money to redo the last two years of dental school.
For foreign-trained physicians, there is already a mechanism nationwide for them to match into U.S. residency programs and gain unrestricted U.S. licenses to practice following their residency training. I'm by no means an expert in the area of medical education, but I don't personally advocate for changing the requirement to do a U.S. residency, because I consider it vital to ensuring clinical and cultural competence and they are able to sit for their Boards after their residency and demonstrate that they are qualified to practice medicine to acceptable standards. I'm not sure the public would accept such a change. To me, the true issue with foreign-trained physicians is work authorization and restrictions on allowing them to stay in the country without a 2-3 year home residency requirement first. Sure there are J-1 and H1b visas available, but the numbers allowed in are not enough to meet our current and future national need for physicians, especially in primary care for underserved areas. I personally think we need to attack the problem from immigration/work visa angle, which of course is national in scope.
Post new comment